Left Wing Social Media "Influencers" Are a Huge Piece of the Psy-Ops Being Perpetrated on Us All!
Let's call them what they really are...manipulators!
The political shill…making money, hand over fist, while working on behalf of the democrat party. Many of these professional influencers get their marching orders from the White House, the DNC and other left-wing politicians and cultural elites. Their mission is to ensure the party hangs on to their current base of ignoramouses, while also attempting to manipulate us non-ignoramouses who don’t support the democrat party. They run cover for corrupt democrats who are guilty of criminal activity, and attack conservative candidates and their policies as well as their supporters.
Recently, a great example of this work was posted on Twitter, when social media influencer and democrat shill, Brian Krassenstein attempted to educate all of us “stupid people" on the criminality of Trump versus the virtuousness of Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. Below is his Twitter post that started a firestorm of debate, along with a very large helping of indignation.
GOP: Hillary is a criminal
FACT: Trump indicted on 71 CRIMINAL countsGOP: Joe Biden is a criminal
FACT: Trump indicted on 71 CRIMINAL countsGOP: Biden is working with China to make money.
FACT: The top witness for the GOP claiming Biden corruption was just indicted and accused of being tied to China.Sure, you can think that there is a massive plot by the FBI, led by a Trump-appointee, to somehow get an Independent Grand Jury to indict those who doesn't like Biden, or you can believe that those who are indicted have a much better chance of being the actual criminals.
One line of thinking is much more rational than the other."
To the uninformed, “get Trump” idiot, this tweet is like a drug. “Hillary and Joe are criminals. Hey, look over here, Trump was indicted on 71 criminal counts.” The truth is, there is a mountain of evidence against both the Clinton and Biden families that has been suppressed, ignored and even manipulated by federal authorities. And while those federal authorities suppress, ignore and manipulate that evidence, leftist, social media hacks help manipulate the ignorant hordes, making them even more ignorant, while protecting real criminals. The sad part, is that these “influencers” know all of this, yet continue the charade, unabated by their lack of morality.
Recently, conservative Senator Tommy Tuberville was on CNN, where he was berated by the host regarding his support of nationalism. The fact that he happens to be white automatically made him a racist, white nationalist. Almost immediately, highly experienced, 20 year old democrat shill, Harry Sisson posted his contrived, DNC talking points on Twitter.
If you refuse to condemn white nationalism, you should NOT be serving in the Senate.
Yet, Republicans stand by Senator Tuberville and his refusal to condemn it. Disgusting.
We all know what nationalism is…but what is white nationalism, exactly? According to Harry Sisson, and other liberal social media manipulators, if you are white, and believe in nation states like our current country, you are a racist. Who decided to equate being white, while believing in your nation state with racism, nazism or white supremacy? The globalist left did, that’s who. What about blacks, hispanics, asians or other races who believe in nationalism…are they racist nazis too, or are they just misguided by the white nationalists?
Of course, Brian Krassenstein was all over this controversy, like white on rice…pardon the pun. He, again tried to help all of us “stupid people" when he posted this tweet, that included Merriam-Websters definition of white nationalist.
GOP Senator, Tommy Tuberville clearly doesn't know what a "White Nationalist" is or is pretending not to.
CNN's Collins: "A white nationalist is racist, Senator."
Tuberville: "Well, that's your opinion."
Here is the Merriam-Webster definition of "White Nationalist":
"One of a group of militant white people who espouse white supremacy and advocate enforced racial segregation."
One little piece of information that Krassenstein left out of the definition was the following, disclaimer paragraph just below the definition on the Merriam-Webster site.
These examples are programmatically compiled from various online sources to illustrate current usage of the word 'white nationalist.' Any opinions expressed in the examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors.
Do you see how this works? If Merriam-Webster defined it as such, well then it’s true and Merriam-Webster is the standard bearer on defining white nationalism. And don’t go to their web site, because you ignorant people might see the disclaimer paragraph below the definition that clearly states that “any opinions expressed in the examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors.” In other words, Merriam-Webster is only taking data and information from other online sources to come up with the definition.
What would Harry, Brian and their liberal benefactors do if Merriam-Webster defined white nationalism as a term created by left-wing zealots, influencers and politicians, used to smear conservatives as racists, nazis and white supremacists? They would have a Merriam-Webster dictionary burning party.
