Liberal Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Has Lost Her Mind
She compared a ban on child mutilation within the transgender industry to banning interracial marriage in Virginia that ended in 1967.
We know there are sick individuals out there who believe puberty blockers and hormone therapy are ok to use in cases of gender dysphoria (that is what we are really dealing with here). The entire transgender community is OK with all of this. Even many educators have been known to target children while keeping it from parents. But now this sickness has made it all the way to the Supreme Court. Ketanji Brown Jackson is drawing a comparison between a ban on interracial marriage and a ban on child mutilation. I find it hard to believe that there are people who bitch and complain about conservative justices when we have a seriously demented person like Brown-Jackson on the bench.
The following quote came from a case before the Supreme Court right now. The case deals with the Constitutionality of banning puberty blockers and hormone therapy for adolescents.
The question was whether this was discriminatory because it applied to both races. But as I read the statute here, I mean the case here, it states that Virginia is one of the states that punishes marriages on the basis of race.
When you look at the structure of that law, you can’t do something that is inconsistent with your own characteristics. It looks like the same thing. So, it’s now interesting that we have this different argument, and I wonder if Virginia could have gotten away with what they did here by making a classification argument the way Tennessee is in this case.
Supreme Court Justice
Ketanji Brown Jackson
Her DEI status as a Supreme Court Justice is shining through as much as her cluelessness is. Loving v. Virginia was the case she was referring to. This Supreme Court case struck down the ban on interracial marriages in Virginia in 1967, almost 60 years ago. You cannot compare the two issues as they are not even in the same galaxy, let alone the same ballpark. But leave it to a DEI hire on the Supreme Court to attempt drawing a comparison. This unbelievably sick thinking leaves no doubt where she stands on the case before the Supreme Court right now. Truly disgusting.